INTRO: Both
PROMPT: For your second rough paper, I want you to discuss how each book subverts the typical ‘bildungsroman’ model. Clearly neither Soseki nor Naipaul was interested in writing a paint-by-numbers story. Instead, they wanted to use the basic template of a bildungsroman to do something else—or to suggest why this model doesn’t work in ‘real’ life. As you write, consider SOME of the following ideas:
- What lessons do the heroes learn (or incorrectly learn) during their stories?
- Who are their role models? Who are their enemies? Why is this important?
- Is the author sympathetic to our heroes? Or are they something satirizing or outright mocking them?
- How do other characters in the stories view the heroes and their education? Are they impressed by them? Or disgusted?
- How do they learn to define manhood (since both are men) through the stories and chapters of each work? What do they accept, and what do they reject?
- Does each hero get a ‘career’ by the end? Is it their “chosen calling”? Or do they settle for something “good enough”?
- Do the
heroes receive a universal education…or is it specific to their respective
countries/cultures?
REQUIREMENTS
- Page numbers are up to you; it’s a rough paper, so you decide how much is enough (but try to avoid saying too little)
- Quote from both books: don’t simply summarize or paraphrase, and please don’t give us plot summary. Analyze the ideas and language of the stories.
- Try to show connections between the books, even when they don’t agree with one another
- Due
Monday, November 16th for Wednesday Classes
- Due Wednesday, November 18th for Monday Classes
No comments:
Post a Comment